How to Assess Cloud Adoption Maturity

e-Core • May 22, 2024

Understanding the overall vision of cloud migration and the benefits it can bring to the business, as defined by the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework, is essential for planning the transition from traditional infrastructure. Each company has its own cloud adoption journey, so it’s important to assess its readiness. The AWS Cloud Readiness Assessment (CART) is a crucial tool for this process.


In the CART assessment, the organization’s current status across six perspectives, divided into a list of 47 items, is analyzed. Each item undergoes evaluation based on five distinct levels:


  1. No Awareness: Limited or no understanding of the subject matter.
  2. Early Consideration: Beginning to explore the topic and its implications.
  3. Pilot Testing: Initiating trial runs or experimental projects.
  4. Partial Implementation: The presence of initiatives, albeit with inconsistent deployment across the organization.
  5. Full Integration: Complete and consistent implementation throughout the organization.


Cloud adoption maturity: Overview of the journey

Realizing what the expected benefits are for the business according to the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework, we need to understand at what stage the company is to plan a course of action. After all, each cloud transformation is unique.


An example of an item in the CART from a business perspective is whether the company is using the cloud to develop new processes, products, and experiences, and improve existing ones. It may seem like a simple question, but often when we inquire about the motivation for migrating to the cloud, many companies do not have a direct answer to this.


Knowing what the expected benefits for the business are according to the AWS Cloud Adoption Framework, we need to understand what stage the company is at in order to draw up an action plan.


Another question, now from the security perspective, is whether the company is monitoring, evaluating, managing, and improving the efficiency of security and privacy programs. As previously mentioned, the fact that a company has migrated its systems to the cloud does not necessarily indicate an advanced level of usage. Many still don’t have a security and privacy program implemented, and planning through CART will support this journey.


Another vital aspect is to enlist an experienced and qualified professional to accurately address CART’s inquiries. Often, companies complete the checklist without possessing comprehensive knowledge of the expectations for each item. Trained professionals familiar with responding to CART items have already gained experience through various migrations and can assist in providing the most precise answers by benchmarking with other migrations they’ve been involved in.


At the end, the organization will have a report depicting its current state related to cloud adoption, identifying areas of highest maturity and those in need of further development.


Using the heat map, it’s possible to discern the company’s priorities and devise an action plan for advancing across the 6 perspectives, thereby enabling a more successful cloud adoption journey.


If you’d like to understand your cloud adoption maturity, feel free to reach out to our team of specialists to plan a Cloud Readiness Assessment.

LET'S CONNECT

Ready to unlock your team's potential?


e-Core

We combine global expertise with emerging technologies to help companies like yours create innovative digital products, modernize technology platforms, and improve efficiency in digital operations.


You may also be interested in:

Por Adriele Radmann 3 de agosto de 2026
Discover why customer support is your strongest shield against churn. Learn how to connect support, product dev, and AI to protect recurring revenue.
23 de julho de 2026
See how Banco Inter migrated to Jira Cloud, cut $200K in annual costs, and boosted team efficiency with e-Core as its implementation partner.
Por Flávia Batista 10 de julho de 2026
There is a belief that runs deep inside IT operations teams: a noisy environment is a healthy one. If alerts are firing constantly, if tickets are piling up, if the on-call rotation is getting hit at 2am, that means monitoring is working. The tools are catching things. I understand where this comes from. In the early days of observability, silence was genuinely suspicious. A quiet dashboard often meant a gap in coverage, a misconfigured rule, something important slipping through undetected. So teams learned to treat volume as proof, and that instinct stayed long after the environment around it changed. But noise is not proof that monitoring is working. In most cases, it is proof that something upstream was never fixed. Automation at the wrong end When alert volume becomes unsustainable, the response is almost always the same. Leadership looks at the backlog (a thousand tickets a day, engineers buried, SLAs slipping) and reaches for automation at the remediation end of the pipeline: AI agents plugged into monitoring tools, scripts that fire when incident X arrives, routing logic that moves tickets faster. These are reasonable responses to an unreasonable situation, but they treat cost rather than cause. Most of those alerts should never have been generated. Processing them faster does not change why they exist.