AI for forest asset management: anticipating frost before it strikes

e-Core • August 13, 2024

This case study explores the collaboration between e-Core and a leading pulp producer, who faced a critical challenge: assessing the potential impact of frost on paper production. Frost poses a significant threat, ranging from minor disruptions to severe losses in cellulose output. Given the unpredictable nature of forest asset management, especially under the influence of climate change, our partnership aimed to develop an advanced frost detection mechanism powered by AI, enabling proactive strategies to mitigate potential losses.

Opportunities

The primary objective of this project was to conduct a proof of concept (PoC) to verify the ability to identify unexpected production changes, specifically those caused by frost. We analyzed data from the Monitora and Zeus systems — tools designed for real-time monitoring and data collection in forest operations — focusing on critical areas such as geographic intelligence and forest asset management, utilizing AI to manage the inherent unpredictability of this field.

Project Stages

Our project adhered to the CRISP-DM (Cross-Industry Standard Process for Data Mining) framework, a widely recognized methodology for data mining and machine learning projects. This structured approach guided us through six key phases, each contributing to the successful development of our AI-driven PoC.

  • Business Understanding: We thoroughly understood the business objectives and PoC goals. Collaborating with stakeholders, we defined requirements, set key performance indicators (KPIs), and ensured alignment with the operational context.
  • Data Understanding: We assessed the available data to understand its quality and relevance. Although Sentinel-2 satellite images were considered, they were ultimately deemed impractical due to complexities and uncertainties. Key variables, particularly meteorological factors like humidity and minimum temperature, were identified as critical for frost prediction.
  • Data Preparation: We focused on ensuring the dataset’s quality, selecting the most relevant columns and applying interpolation to create a comprehensive data area. This preparation was crucial for feeding the model with robust inputs.
  • Modeling: In this phase, we built the PoC’s analytical foundation. We selected appropriate algorithms, split data into training and testing sets, and continuously optimized performance using accuracy and recall metrics.
  • Evaluation: A thorough analysis of the model’s performance was conducted, ensuring it met the business understanding criteria. Collaboration with the client’s experts helped validate predictions and refine the model as needed.
  • Implementation/Delivery: The final phase involved implementing and delivering the PoC’s results. We worked closely with the client to validate and refine outcomes, ensuring the model aligned with both business and technical goals.

Project Results

The project led to significant advancements in frost detection for our pulp sector partner through a series of five experiments. Leveraging AI and machine learning models, we developed a highly accurate classifier that reliably distinguishes frost events from other anomalies. The experimentation process, involving several iterations, was vital in optimizing the model’s performance.

Key Results:

  • Enhanced Frost Detection Accuracy: The final model achieved approximately 98% accuracy in identifying frost occurrences, making it highly reliable.
  • Refined Feature Selection: Meteorological factors, particularly minimum temperature and humidity, were identified as the most crucial variables for predicting frost, streamlining the model for better performance.
  • Consistent Historical Data Performance: The model consistently identified frost events when applied to historical data, avoiding false positives during periods without frost.
  • Improved Data Handling: Unsupervised learning in Experiment 5 effectively addressed challenges in labeling large datasets, enhancing the model’s robustness.
  • Operational Impact: The AI-driven frost detection model enables proactive decision-making, helping the company mitigate potential losses from frost damage, thereby reducing operational risks and improving resource management.

Advanced AI Solutions

Using precise data classification, our team developed an advanced AI model capable of identifying frosts with notable accuracy. One particular experiment stood out, achieving 98% accuracy in tests and consistently validating the model’s effectiveness with previously unclassified historical data. The chosen Random Forest model, known for its efficiency and ease of training, provides a robust solution for precise frost identification.

Projected Benefits

  • Early identification of at-risk areas within forest assets
  • Optimized resource allocation based on predictive analytics
  • Improved accuracy in weather forecasting, enhancing operational decision-making
  • Automation of processes leading to increased efficiency and significant cost reductions
  • Strengthened technological innovation, reinforcing the company’s competitive market position

Future Perspectives

In conclusion, the Proof of Concept demonstrates the feasibility of using data from Monitora and Zeus systems, combined with AI and machine learning algorithms, to detect changes caused by frost. This approach significantly enhances forest asset management, particularly in a field as unpredictable as forestry under climate change. Looking ahead, there are opportunities to further refine the model by exploring more complex data characteristics, integrating additional relevant information, and expanding its capacity to recognize a broader range of climate anomalies.


LET'S CONNECT

Ready to unlock your team's potential?


Blue logo with turquoise icon of person with upward arrows, white

e-Core

We combine global expertise with emerging technologies to help companies like yours create innovative digital products, modernize technology platforms, and improve efficiency in digital operations.


You may also be interested in:

By Adriele Radmann August 3, 2026
Discover why customer support is your strongest shield against churn. Learn how to connect support, product dev, and AI to protect recurring revenue.
July 23, 2026
See how Banco Inter migrated to Jira Cloud, cut $200K in annual costs, and boosted team efficiency with e-Core as its implementation partner.
By Flávia Batista July 10, 2026
There is a belief that runs deep inside IT operations teams: a noisy environment is a healthy one. If alerts are firing constantly, if tickets are piling up, if the on-call rotation is getting hit at 2am, that means monitoring is working. The tools are catching things. I understand where this comes from. In the early days of observability, silence was genuinely suspicious. A quiet dashboard often meant a gap in coverage, a misconfigured rule, something important slipping through undetected. So teams learned to treat volume as proof, and that instinct stayed long after the environment around it changed. But noise is not proof that monitoring is working. In most cases, it is proof that something upstream was never fixed. Automation at the wrong end When alert volume becomes unsustainable, the response is almost always the same. Leadership looks at the backlog (a thousand tickets a day, engineers buried, SLAs slipping) and reaches for automation at the remediation end of the pipeline: AI agents plugged into monitoring tools, scripts that fire when incident X arrives, routing logic that moves tickets faster. These are reasonable responses to an unreasonable situation, but they treat cost rather than cause. Most of those alerts should never have been generated. Processing them faster does not change why they exist.