Expandindo o universo do Jira Software para o Jira Service Management

e-Core • October 3, 2022

A sua ferramenta de gerenciamento de serviços de TI é cheia de regras e deixa tudo engessado? Se sim, então você está bem longe do ITIL 4.


Neste vídeo, Fábio Rosa, Advisor de ITSM da e-Core, explica como as atualizações do ITIL 4 aproximam as práticas de gerenciamento de serviços de TI do manifesto ágil. Assim, o ITSM deixa de ser algo engessado e passa a ajudar os times a elaborarem processos e práticas bem definidos, trazendo agilidade e facilidade na implementação de projetos, inerentes à transformação digital.


Dessa forma, você irá conferir:


  • Como o Jira Service Management está alinhado ao ITIL 4;
  • O ciclo de vida de atendimento em TI de acordo com o ITIL 4;
  • Demonstração prática de atendimento de incidente via slack (ou qualquer outro canal);
  • Integração da ferramenta de ITSM da Atlassian com o Jira Software para cuidar da causa raiz de um problema.


Preencha o formulário e assista ao vídeo


Blue background with white

e-Core

We combine global expertise with emerging technologies to help companies like yours create innovative digital products, modernize technology platforms, and improve efficiency in digital operations.


You may also be interested in:

By Adriele Radmann August 3, 2026
Discover why customer support is your strongest shield against churn. Learn how to connect support, product dev, and AI to protect recurring revenue.
July 23, 2026
See how Banco Inter migrated to Jira Cloud, cut $200K in annual costs, and boosted team efficiency with e-Core as its implementation partner.
By Flávia Batista July 10, 2026
There is a belief that runs deep inside IT operations teams: a noisy environment is a healthy one. If alerts are firing constantly, if tickets are piling up, if the on-call rotation is getting hit at 2am, that means monitoring is working. The tools are catching things. I understand where this comes from. In the early days of observability, silence was genuinely suspicious. A quiet dashboard often meant a gap in coverage, a misconfigured rule, something important slipping through undetected. So teams learned to treat volume as proof, and that instinct stayed long after the environment around it changed. But noise is not proof that monitoring is working. In most cases, it is proof that something upstream was never fixed. Automation at the wrong end When alert volume becomes unsustainable, the response is almost always the same. Leadership looks at the backlog (a thousand tickets a day, engineers buried, SLAs slipping) and reaches for automation at the remediation end of the pipeline: AI agents plugged into monitoring tools, scripts that fire when incident X arrives, routing logic that moves tickets faster. These are reasonable responses to an unreasonable situation, but they treat cost rather than cause. Most of those alerts should never have been generated. Processing them faster does not change why they exist.